International Harvester Farmall 544 or Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmall 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester Farmall 544 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 73% (19.2 L/min / 5.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Farmall 544 | R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | 38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmall 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmall 544 and the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmall 544 and the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 45.4 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | 26.2 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | AheadThe International Harvester Farmall 544 has 73% more hydraulic flow (19.2 L/min / 5.1 gpm) than the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,100 kg (2,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Farmall 544. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,766 kg (6,098 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | 1,890 kg (4,167 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester Farmall 544 is 46% heavier (876 kg / 1,931 lb) than the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Farmall 544 and the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | 12 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester Farmall 544 is stepless (CVT) and the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) has 12 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmall 544 and the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | AheadThe International Harvester Farmall 544 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 544” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5000” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1968–1973 | 1968–1974 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester Farmall 544 has 73% more hydraulic flow (19.2 L/min / 5.1 gpm) than the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester Farmall 544 is 46% heavier (876 kg / 1,931 lb) than the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester Farmall 544 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Transmissions differ in kind: the International Harvester Farmall 544 is stepless (CVT) and the Landini R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) has 12 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmall 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5000 Special (TL 14 N/A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources