International Harvester Farmall 504 vs VALMET 565

12 material differences

Tractor one

1961–1968

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1964–1968

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Farmall 504 and the 565 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester Farmall 504 and VALMET 565, field by field
Field	Farmall 504	565	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	45.3 hp	45.3 hp	—
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-153	VALMET 310 A or 310 B	differs
Displacement declared	2.49 L	2.69 L	+8% 565
Maximum torque declared	—	127 lb·ft · 172 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry single plate clutch	Pedal-operated dry Borg & Beck single-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	12.0 gpm · 45.5 L/min	6.4 gpm · 24.1 L/min	+89% Farmall 504
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	2,976 lb · 1,350 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,386 lb · 2,443 kg	4,259 lb · 1,932 kg	+26% Farmall 504
Wheelbase declared	89.0 in · 2,261 mm	74.6 in · 1,895 mm	+19% Farmall 504
Length declared	132.8 in · 3,372 mm	122.4 in · 3,110 mm	+8% Farmall 504
Width declared	83.0 in · 2,108 mm	70.1 in · 1,780 mm	+18% Farmall 504
Height declared	78.0 in · 1,981 mm	87.4 in · 2,220 mm	+12% 565
Ground clearance declared	23.3 in · 591 mm	18.9 in · 480 mm	+23% Farmall 504
Turning radius, braked declared	8.2 ft · 2.50 m	9.8 ft · 2.98 m	+19% 565
Fuel tank declared	90.0 qt · 85.2 L	40.2 qt · 38.0 L	+124% Farmall 504

Source

Source