International Harvester 240 Utility vs John Deere-LANZ 310

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

International Harvester 240 Utility

1958–1961

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

John Deere-LANZ 310

1964–1968

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 240 Utility and the 310 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester 240 Utility and John Deere-LANZ 310, field by field
Field240 Utility310Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed31.5 hp31.5 hp
Engine declaredINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-123John Deere 152 D 25 Ldiffers
Displacement declared2.01 L2.49 L+24% 310
Maximum torque declared101 lb·ft · 137 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared14.3 mph · 23 km/h12.4–15.5 mph · 20–25 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredPedal-operated dry Rockford single-plate clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared6.0 gpm · 22.8 L/min4.1 gpm · 15.6 L/min+46% 240 Utility
Pressure declared2,190 psi · 151 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared2,646 lb · 1,200 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,638 lb · 1,650 kg4,361 lb · 1,978 kg+20% 310
Maximum permissible mass declared5,864 lb · 2,660 kg
Wheelbase declared75.0 in · 1,905 mm81.6 in · 2,072 mm+9% 310
Length declared116.0 in · 2,946 mm133.9 in · 3,400 mm+15% 310
Width declared63.0 in · 1,600 mm62.2 in · 1,580 mm
Height declared58.0 in · 1,473 mm61.8 in · 1,570 mm+7% 310
Ground clearance declared17.0 in · 432 mm15.7 in · 400 mm+8% 240 Utility
Turning radius, braked declared10.8 ft · 3.30 m
Fuel tank declared64.8 qt · 61.3 L74.0 qt · 70 L+14% 310

International Harvester 240 Utility sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 240”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Farmall Super-A 1”

John Deere-LANZ 310 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310”