IMT 577 (DV) or Leyland 262?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the Leyland 262 is ahead on hydraulic flow; the IMT 577 (DV) is ahead on three-point lift and drive.

  • The IMT 577 (DV) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 577 (DV) and Leyland 262, with the call on each
Question577 (DV)262Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.8 kW (52.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”39.0 kW (52.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 577 (DV) and the 262.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 577 (DV) and the 262.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.3 L/min (5.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”31.3 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”AheadThe Leyland 262 has 40% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the IMT 577 (DV) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”1,876 kg (4,136 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”AheadThe IMT 577 (DV) has 36% more lift (674 kg / 1,486 lb) than the Leyland 262 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,940 kg (6,482 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”3,050 kg (6,724 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 577 (DV) and the 262.
Which has the wider choice of gears?10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”9 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 577 (DV) and the 262.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 577”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”AheadThe IMT 577 (DV) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 262 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19931975–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 577 (DV) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Leyland 262 has 40% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the IMT 577 (DV) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The IMT 577 (DV) has 36% more lift (674 kg / 1,486 lb) than the Leyland 262 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The IMT 577 (DV) is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 262 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The IMT 577 (DV) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources