IMT 588 vs URSUS C-350
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 588 and the C-350 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 588 | C-350 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 57.3 hp | 44.4 hp | +29% 588 |
| Engine declared | IMR-PERKINS M-34/T | URSUS/ZM S-4001 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.34 L | 3.12 L | +7% 588 |
| Maximum torque declared | 154 lb·ft · 209 N·m | 133 lb·ft · 180 N·m | +16% 588 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 13.7 mph · 22 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +14% C-350 |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated, dry two-stage KRON-NOVI double clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.0 gpm · 15.1 L/min | 5.3 gpm · 20.0 L/min | +32% C-350 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,469 lb · 1,120 kg | 2,646 lb · 1,200 kg | +7% C-350 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,071 lb · 2,300 kg | 4,731 lb · 2,146 kg | +7% 588 |
| Wheelbase declared | 83.4 in · 2,118 mm | 83.7 in · 2,125 mm | — |
| Length declared | 146.3 in · 3,715 mm | 128.0 in · 3,250 mm | +14% 588 |
| Width declared | 71.2 in · 1,808 mm | 70.9 in · 1,800 mm | — |
| Height declared | 63.7 in · 1,618 mm | 63.8 in · 1,620 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 16.9 in · 430 mm | 17.2 in · 436 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 12.5 ft · 3.80 m | 11.5 ft · 3.49 m | +9% 588 |
| Fuel tank declared | 52.8 qt · 50.0 L | 74.0 qt · 70.0 L | +40% C-350 |
IMT 588 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”
URSUS C-350 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350”