IMT 555 or John Deere-LANZ 700?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for IMT 555 and John Deere-LANZ 700, with the call on each
Question555700Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 555 and the 700.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 555 and the 700.
Which pumps more oil for implements?15.1 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 700.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,180 kg (2,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 555: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”); the 700: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,870 kg (4,123 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere-LANZ 700 is 23% heavier (430 kg / 948 lb) than the IMT 555 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 555.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 700 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the IMT 555 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 555 and the 700.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 700 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 555 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 555 and the 700.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1964–19711963–1965EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere-LANZ 700 is 23% heavier (430 kg / 948 lb) than the IMT 555 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere-LANZ 700 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the IMT 555 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere-LANZ 700 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 555 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 555: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”); the 700: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources