IMT 542 or Massey Ferguson MF 350?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson 350: three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson 350 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 31% (443 kg / 977 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 542 | MF 350 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 24.7 kW (33.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 22.9 kW (30.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 542 and the MF 350. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 542 and the MF 350. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 18.5 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 19.0 L/min (5.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,407 kg (3,102 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 350 has 31% more lift (443 kg / 977 lb) than the IMT 542 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,815 kg (4,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 2,629 kg (5,796 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 350 is 45% heavier (814 kg / 1,795 lb) than the IMT 542 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 542 and the MF 350. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 542 and the MF 350. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 540/1789 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 350. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 542” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986– | 1987–1994 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 350 has 31% more lift (443 kg / 977 lb) than the IMT 542 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 350 is 45% heavier (814 kg / 1,795 lb) than the IMT 542 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources