Hürlimann XN-706 or Landini TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F"?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the XN-706 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann XN-706 and Landini TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F", with the call on each
QuestionXN-706TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F"Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”47.1 kW (63.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XN-706 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the XN-706 and the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F".
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the XN-706 and the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F".
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”37.1 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,925 kg (4,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”1,540 kg (3,395 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the XN-706: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”); the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F": lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”2,040 kg (4,497 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XN-706 is 15% heavier (310 kg / 683 lb) than the Landini TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F" (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the XN-706 and the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F".
Which has the wider choice of gears?20Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the XN-706 and the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F".
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XN-706 and the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F".
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”; OECD test report 1814, 1999Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20031983–1987Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XN-706 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann XN-706 is 15% heavier (310 kg / 683 lb) than the Landini TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F" (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann XN-706 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the XN-706 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the XN-706: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XN 706”); the TL 32 A (DT) "R 6530 F": lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Landini TL 32 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources