Hürlimann H-80 XA or John Deere 6130?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 6130 suits road haulage better on this data: 52% (2,600 kg / 5,732 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-80 XA | 6130 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 60.4 kW (81.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-80 XA and the 6130. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-80 XA and the 6130. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 6130. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-80 XA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”); the 6130: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 4,750 kg (10,472 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 6130 is 64% heavier (1,850 kg / 4,079 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 7,600 kg (16,755 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | AheadThe John Deere 6130 has 52% higher maximum permissible mass (2,600 kg / 5,732 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 30 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-80 XA and the 6130. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-80 XA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2009–2014 | 2006–2012 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 6130 is 64% heavier (1,850 kg / 4,079 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 6130 has 52% higher maximum permissible mass (2,600 kg / 5,732 lb) than the Hürlimann H-80 XA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-80 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6130 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-80 XA: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 80”); the 6130: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6130”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources