Hürlimann H-658 XA or VALMET 6250 HiTech?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 6250 HiTech: hydraulic flow and maximum permissible mass.
- The VALMET 6250 HiTech suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (29.0 L/min / 7.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The VALMET 6250 HiTech suits road haulage better on this data: 80% (4,000 kg / 8,818 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-658 XA | 6250 HiTech | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 56.4 kW (75.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 56.2 kW (75.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-658 XA and the 6250 HiTech. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-658 XA and the 6250 HiTech. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 73.5 L/min (19.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | AheadThe VALMET 6250 HiTech has 65% more hydraulic flow (29.0 L/min / 7.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,692 kg (5,935 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 5,710 kg (12,588 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-658 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”); the 6250 HiTech: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 4,399 kg (9,698 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6250 HiTech is 65% heavier (1,739 kg / 3,834 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | AheadThe VALMET 6250 HiTech has 80% higher maximum permissible mass (4,000 kg / 8,818 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-658 XA and the 6250 HiTech. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-658 XA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2004 | 2000–2006 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 6250 HiTech has 65% more hydraulic flow (29.0 L/min / 7.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6250 HiTech is 65% heavier (1,739 kg / 3,834 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6250 HiTech has 80% higher maximum permissible mass (4,000 kg / 8,818 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-658 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”); the 6250 HiTech: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6250 HiTech”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources