Hürlimann H-6160 A or Steyr 8170 a?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann H-6160 A: hydraulic flow and maximum permissible mass.

  • The Hürlimann H-6160 A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (16.0 L/min / 4.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Hürlimann H-6160 A suits road haulage better on this data: 16% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-6160 A and Steyr 8170 a, with the call on each
QuestionH-6160 A8170 aCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?100.4 kW (134.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”100.3 kW (134.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-6160 A and the 8170 a.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-6160 A and the 8170 a.
Which pumps more oil for implements?58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”42.0 L/min (11.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”AheadThe Hürlimann H-6160 A has 38% more hydraulic flow (16.0 L/min / 4.2 gpm) than the Steyr 8170 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,540 kg (14,418 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the H-6160 A.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,450 kg (14,220 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”6,024 kg (13,281 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,300 kg (20,503 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”AheadThe Hürlimann H-6160 A has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Steyr 8170 a (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-6160 A and the 8170 a.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-6160 A.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8170”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1979–19831980–1986EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-6160 A has 38% more hydraulic flow (16.0 L/min / 4.2 gpm) than the Steyr 8170 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-6160 A has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Steyr 8170 a (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources