Hürlimann H-6160 A or International Harvester 4156?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Hürlimann H-6160 A is ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds; the International Harvester 4156 is ahead on top speed.
- The Hürlimann H-6160 A suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
- The International Harvester 4156 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-6160 A | 4156 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 100.4 kW (134.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | 103.0 kW (138.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4156” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-6160 A and the 4156. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-6160 A and the 4156. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | 62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4156” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the H-6160 A and the 4156. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,450 kg (14,220 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | 6,883 kg (15,174 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4156” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 9,300 kg (20,503 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4156. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4156” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-6160 A has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the International Harvester 4156 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-6160 A and the 4156. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4156” | AheadThe International Harvester 4156 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann H-6160 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 4156” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-6160 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester 4156 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-6160 A and the 4156. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6160” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 4156” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1983 | 1969–1970 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-6160 A is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann H-6160 A has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the International Harvester 4156 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 4156 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann H-6160 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-6160 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester 4156 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Hürlimann H-6160 A is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources