Hürlimann H-6130 A or SAME Buffalo 130 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann H-6130 A: hydraulic flow.
- The Hürlimann H-6130 A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-6130 A | Buffalo 130 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 78.6 kW (105.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | 80.2 kW (107.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-6130 A and the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-6130 A and the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | 35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-6130 A has 11% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,210 kg (9,281 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | 4,568 kg (10,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-6130 A: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130”); the Buffalo 130 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,750 kg (12,677 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-6130 A is 34% heavier (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-6130 A and the Buffalo 130 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-6130 A. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1982 | 1978–1982 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann H-6130 A has 11% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-6130 A is 34% heavier (1,450 kg / 3,197 lb) than the SAME Buffalo 130 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-6130 A: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6130”); the Buffalo 130 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo 130”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources