Hürlimann H-5110 (A) or Landini 12.500 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-5110 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 12.500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Landini 12.500 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (925 kg / 2,039 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-5110 (A) and Landini 12.500 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionH-5110 (A)12.500 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?80.9 kW (108.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”80.9 kW (108.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-5110 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 12.500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-5110 (A) and the 12.500 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-5110 (A) and the 12.500 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?62.0 L/min (16.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-5110 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,875 kg (8,543 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”AheadThe Landini 12.500 (DT) has 24% more lift (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the Hürlimann H-5110 (A) (both lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,300 kg (9,480 lb) to 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”4,810 kg (10,604 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,300 kg (16,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 12.500 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-5110 (A) and the 12.500 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-5110 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 5110”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 12500”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1979–19831978–1990EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini 12.500 (DT) has 24% more lift (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the Hürlimann H-5110 (A) (both lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-5110 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 12.500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources