Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" or John Deere 5300 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the John Deere 5300 (A): hydraulic flow. On features, the Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" is ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The John Deere 5300 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 54% (15.4 L/min / 4.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-358 "Prestige" | 5300 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.0 kW (51.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 37.8 kW (50.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-358 "Prestige" and the 5300 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-358 "Prestige" and the 5300 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 28.5 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 43.9 L/min (11.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | AheadThe John Deere 5300 (A) has 54% more hydraulic flow (15.4 L/min / 4.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 1,725 kg (3,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-358 "Prestige": lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358”); the 5300 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,775 kg (6,118 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 2,064 kg (4,550 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" is 34% heavier (711 kg / 1,567 lb) than the John Deere 5300 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-358 "Prestige" and the 5300 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 15 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 9 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-358 "Prestige" and the 5300 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5300 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1989–1998 | 1992–1997 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 5300 (A) has 54% more hydraulic flow (15.4 L/min / 4.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" is 34% heavier (711 kg / 1,567 lb) than the John Deere 5300 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5300 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-358 "Prestige": lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358”); the 5300 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5300 (USA)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources