Hürlimann H-345 (A) or Steyr 942 (a)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann H-345 (A): hydraulic flow. On features, the Steyr 942 (a) is ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.

  • The Steyr 942 (a) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Hürlimann H-345 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (4.6 L/min / 1.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-345 (A) and Steyr 942 (a), with the call on each
QuestionH-345 (A)942 (a)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?27.0 kW (36.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”26.6 kW (35.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-345 (A) and the 942 (a).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-345 (A) and the 942 (a).
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”29.4 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”AheadThe Hürlimann H-345 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (4.6 L/min / 1.2 gpm) than the Steyr 942 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,764 kg (3,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”1,820 kg (4,012 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-345 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”); the 942 (a): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,020 kg (4,453 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”2,365 kg (5,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 942 (a) is 17% heavier (345 kg / 761 lb) than the Hürlimann H-345 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-345 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”AheadThe Steyr 942 (a) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Hürlimann H-345 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-345 (A) and the 942 (a).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”AheadThe Steyr 942 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-345 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-345 (A) and the 942 (a).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19861992–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 942 (a) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-345 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (4.6 L/min / 1.2 gpm) than the Steyr 942 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 942 (a) is 17% heavier (345 kg / 761 lb) than the Hürlimann H-345 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 942 (a) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Hürlimann H-345 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 942 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-345 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Steyr 942 (a) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-345 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 345 (A)”); the 942 (a): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 942”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources