Hürlimann D-95 L/S or VALMET 500?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann D-95 L/S: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds. On features, the VALMET 500 is ahead on top speed.
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 17% (250 kg / 551 lb) more three-point lift.
- The VALMET 500 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D-95 L/S | 500 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.6 kW (39.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 29.6 kW (39.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-95 L/S and the 500. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-95 L/S and the 500. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 24.1 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 29% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the VALMET 500 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 1,450 kg (3,197 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 17% more lift (250 kg / 551 lb) than the VALMET 500 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,030 kg (4,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 2,077 kg (4,579 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-95 L/S and the 500. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 500 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-95 L/S and the 500. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | AheadThe VALMET 500 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann D-95 L/S (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-95 L/S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 500 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-95 L/S and the 500. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1975–1977 | 1968–1971 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann D-95 L/S is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 29% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the VALMET 500 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 17% more lift (250 kg / 551 lb) than the VALMET 500 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 500 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 500 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann D-95 L/S (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 500 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources