Hermann Lanz D 28 (TD) vs J.I. Case Case CCS
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (1948–1952; 1937–1938). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | D 28 (TD) | Case CCS | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 27.5 hp | 27.1 hp | — |
| Engine declared | MWM TD 115 or TD 15 | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 2.85 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 116 lb·ft · 157 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 11.0 mph · 17.7 km/h | +13% D 28 (TD) |
| Clutch declared | Single plate dry clutch from Fichtel & Sachs | Hand lever operated double disc clutch, located inside the pulley | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 550 rpm | 535 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,858 lb · 1,750 kg | 4,134 lb · 1,875 kg | +7% Case CCS |
| Wheelbase declared | 69.3 in · 1,760 mm | 87.2 in · 2,216 mm | +26% Case CCS |
| Length declared | 111.4 in · 2,830 mm | 114.0 in · 2,896 mm | — |
| Width declared | 60.6 in · 1,540 mm | 60.0 in · 1,524 mm | — |
| Height declared | 59.1 in · 1,500 mm | 53.0 in · 1,346 mm | +11% D 28 (TD) |
| Ground clearance declared | 14.8 in · 375 mm | 30.0 in · 762 mm | +103% Case CCS |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 4.1 ft · 1.25 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 39.1 qt · 37 L | — | — |
Hermann Lanz D 28 (TD) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 28 (TD)”
J.I. Case Case CCS sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case CCS”