Hanomag R 324 S vs Massey Ferguson MF 30

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Hanomag R 324 S

1959–1962

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Massey Ferguson MF 30

1963–1964

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (1959–1962; 1963–1964). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

7 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Hanomag R 324 S and Massey Ferguson MF 30, field by field
FieldR 324 SMF 30Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed26.6 hp26.7 hp
Engine declaredPerkins A 4.107
Displacement declared1.75 L
Maximum torque declared82 lb·ft · 111 N·m77 lb·ft · 104 N·m+7% R 324 S
Transmission
Top speed declared12.4 mph · 20 km/h12.4 mph · 20 km/h
Clutch declaredPedal operated dry air cooled MF double clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min4.0 gpm · 15.0 L/min+7% R 324 S
Pressure declared1,991 psi · 137 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared2,271 lb · 1,030 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared580 rpm540 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,902 lb · 1,770 kg3,241 lb · 1,470 kg+20% R 324 S
Maximum permissible mass declared5,181 lb · 2,350 kg
Wheelbase declared72.6 in · 1,845 mm72.0 in · 1,830 mm
Length declared116.1 in · 2,950 mm114.6 in · 2,910 mm
Width declared60.6 in · 1,540 mm63.0 in · 1,600 mm
Height declared66.5 in · 1,690 mm55.1 in · 1,400 mm+21% R 324 S
Ground clearance declared14.2 in · 360 mm13.4 in · 340 mm+6% R 324 S
Turning radius, braked declared10.7 ft · 3.25 m9.0 ft · 2.75 m+18% R 324 S
Fuel tank declared47.6 qt · 45 L47.6 qt · 45 L

Hanomag R 324 S sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 324 S”

Massey Ferguson MF 30 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 30”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 30 V”