Hanomag R 324 S vs International Harvester F-235
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the R 324 S and the F-235 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | R 324 S | F-235 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 26.6 hp | 25.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-123 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 2.01 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 82 lb·ft · 111 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 10.6 mph · 17 km/h | +18% R 324 S |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal-operated dry FERODO single-plate clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min | 4.6 gpm · 17.3 L/min | +8% F-235 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 580 rpm | 539 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,902 lb · 1,770 kg | 3,472 lb · 1,575 kg | +12% R 324 S |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 5,181 lb · 2,350 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 72.6 in · 1,845 mm | 91.1 in · 2,315 mm | +25% F-235 |
| Length declared | 116.1 in · 2,950 mm | 130.5 in · 3,315 mm | +12% F-235 |
| Width declared | 60.6 in · 1,540 mm | 78.0 in · 1,981 mm | +29% F-235 |
| Height declared | 66.5 in · 1,690 mm | 74.0 in · 1,879 mm | +11% F-235 |
| Ground clearance declared | 14.2 in · 360 mm | 22.3 in · 567 mm | +57% F-235 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 10.7 ft · 3.25 m | 11.3 ft · 3.45 m | +6% F-235 |
| Fuel tank declared | 47.6 qt · 45 L | 44.1 qt · 41.75 L | +8% R 324 S |
Hanomag R 324 S sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 324 S”
International Harvester F-235 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-235”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Farmall Super-A 1”