Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) or John Deere-LANZ 310?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Perfekt 401 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (3.4 L/min / 0.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Perfekt 401 (S) | 310 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 23 kW (31 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 23.5 kW (31.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Perfekt 401 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Perfekt 401 (S) and the 310. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Perfekt 401 (S) and the 310. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 19.0 L/min (5.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 15.6 L/min (4.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | AheadThe Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) has 22% more hydraulic flow (3.4 L/min / 0.9 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,780 kg (3,924 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 1,978 kg (4,361 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere-LANZ 310 is 11% heavier (198 kg / 437 lb) than the Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Perfekt 401 (S). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 310 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Perfekt 401 (S) and the 310. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 310 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Perfekt 401 (S) and the 310. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 310” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1964–1967 | 1964–1968 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) has 22% more hydraulic flow (3.4 L/min / 0.9 gpm) than the John Deere-LANZ 310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere-LANZ 310 is 11% heavier (198 kg / 437 lb) than the Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere-LANZ 310 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere-LANZ 310 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hanomag Perfekt 401 (S) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Perfekt 401 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources