Hanomag C 220 or International Harvester D-219?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the C 220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-219 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester D-219 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | C 220 | D-219 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 14.6 kW (19.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 14 kW (19 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the C 220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-219 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the C 220 and the D-219. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the C 220 and the D-219. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 14.0 L/min (3.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 19.5 L/min (5.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | AheadThe International Harvester D-219 has 39% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Hanomag C 220 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,020 kg (2,249 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 300 kg (661 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the C 220: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220”); the D-219: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,370 kg (3,020 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 1,271 kg (2,802 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 1,650 kg (3,638 lb) to 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 1,950 kg (4,299 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the C 220. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 19.8 km/h (12.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 18 km/h (11.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1260Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the C 220. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the C 220. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1959–1960 | 1962–1966 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester D-219 has 39% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Hanomag C 220 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the C 220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-219 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the C 220: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag C 220”); the D-219: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-219”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources