Güldner G 35 (S) or UTB U-360?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-360 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Güldner G 35 (S) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (350 kg / 772 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The UTB U-360 suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Güldner G 35 (S) and UTB U-360, with the call on each
QuestionG 35 (S)U-360Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”25.7 kW (34.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-360 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the U-360.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the U-360.
Which pumps more oil for implements?21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the G 35 (S).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,550 kg (3,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”AheadThe Güldner G 35 (S) has 29% more lift (350 kg / 772 lb) than the UTB U-360 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,895 kg (4,178 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”1,723 kg (3,799 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-360.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 35 (S) and the U-360.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”AheadThe UTB U-360 has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”AheadThe Güldner G 35 (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the UTB U-360 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the U-360.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19691977–1991Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-360 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Güldner G 35 (S) has 29% more lift (350 kg / 772 lb) than the UTB U-360 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The UTB U-360 has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Güldner G 35 (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the UTB U-360 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The UTB U-360 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-360 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources