Güldner A 3 K Burgund vs International Harvester Super FC-C

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Güldner A 3 K Burgund

1959–1962

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

International Harvester Super FC-C

1952–1957

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the A 3 K Burgund and the Super FC-C → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

9 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Güldner A 3 K Burgund and International Harvester Super FC-C, field by field
FieldA 3 K BurgundSuper FC-CGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed24.5 hp24 hp
Engine declaredGüldner 3 LKNINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-123differs
Displacement declared1.32 L2.01 L+52% Super FC-C
Maximum torque declared116 lb·ft · 157 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared11.6 mph · 18.6 km/h10.6 mph · 17 km/h+9% A 3 K Burgund
Clutch declaredPedal operated dry double clutch by Fichtel & Sachs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared4.6 gpm · 17.3 L/min
Three-point lift at ends declared1,984 lb · 900 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared546 rpm539 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,230 lb · 1,465 kg3,175 lb · 1,440 kg
Wheelbase declared74.3 in · 1,886 mm91.5 in · 2,324 mm+23% Super FC-C
Length declared123.6 in · 3,140 mm129.5 in · 3,290 mm
Width declared60.0 in · 1,524 mm78.0 in · 1,980 mm+30% Super FC-C
Height declared60.6 in · 1,540 mm71.3 in · 1,810 mm+18% Super FC-C
Ground clearance declared14.8 in · 376 mm22.4 in · 570 mm+52% Super FC-C
Turning radius, braked declared8.7 ft · 2.65 m12.0 ft · 3.65 m+38% Super FC-C
Fuel tank declared44.1 qt · 41.75 L

Güldner A 3 K Burgund sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A 3 K Burgund”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N”

International Harvester Super FC-C sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Super FC-C”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Farmall Super-A 1”