Güldner A 28 vs International Harvester Super FC-C

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1946–1950

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1952–1957

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the A 28 and the Super FC-C → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Güldner A 28 and International Harvester Super FC-C, field by field
Field	A 28	Super FC-C	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	27.6 hp	24 hp	+14% A 28
Engine declared	Güldner 2F	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-123	differs
Displacement declared	2.60 L	2.01 L	+29% A 28
Maximum torque declared	110 lb·ft · 150 N·m	116 lb·ft · 157 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	10.6 mph · 17 km/h	+18% A 28
Clutch declared	Single-plate dry clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	4.6 gpm · 17.3 L/min	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	539 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,023 lb · 1,825 kg	3,175 lb · 1,440 kg	+27% A 28
Wheelbase declared	70.5 in · 1,790 mm	91.5 in · 2,324 mm	+30% Super FC-C
Length declared	115.0 in · 2,920 mm	129.5 in · 3,290 mm	+13% Super FC-C
Width declared	64.6 in · 1,640 mm	78.0 in · 1,980 mm	+21% Super FC-C
Height declared	66.1 in · 1,680 mm	71.3 in · 1,810 mm	+8% Super FC-C
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	22.4 in · 570 mm	+73% Super FC-C
Turning radius, braked declared	—	12.0 ft · 3.65 m	—
Fuel tank declared	44.4 qt · 42 L	44.1 qt · 41.75 L	—

Source

Source