Ford 9600 (A) or VALMET 2005-4?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 2005-4: three-point lift.
- The VALMET 2005-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 48% (1,520 kg / 3,351 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9600 (A) | 2005-4 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 95.8 kW (128.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 95.8 kW (128.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9600 (A) and the 2005-4. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9600 (A) and the 2005-4. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.6 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 62.6 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 4,720 kg (10,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | AheadThe VALMET 2005-4 has 48% more lift (1,520 kg / 3,351 lb) than the Ford 9600 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,270 kg (13,823 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 6,335 kg (13,966 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9600 (A) and the 2005-4. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9600 (A) and the 2005-4. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2005-4. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 2005” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1972–1976 | 1986–1987 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 2005-4 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 2005-4 has 48% more lift (1,520 kg / 3,351 lb) than the Ford 9600 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 2005-4 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources