Ford 9500 vs Massey Ferguson MF 1102
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (2WD; 4WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
8 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9500 | MF 1102 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 94 hp | 93.7 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | Eicher EDK 6 or EDK 6-3 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 5.90 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 231 lb·ft · 314 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +50% MF 1102 |
| Clutch declared | Single-plate dry clutch | Dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 6.0 gpm · 22.7 L/min | 10.6 gpm · 40.0 L/min | +76% MF 1102 |
| Pressure declared | 2,538 psi · 175 bar | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 8,047 lb · 3,650 kg | 9,259 lb · 4,200 kg | +15% MF 1102 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 14,330 lb · 6,500 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 105.9 in · 2,690 mm | 106.2 in · 2,698 mm | — |
| Length declared | 159.1 in · 4,040 mm | 160.6 in · 4,080 mm | — |
| Width declared | 76.8 in · 1,950 mm | 82.3 in · 2,090 mm | +7% MF 1102 |
| Height declared | 69.7 in · 1,770 mm | 67.9 in · 1,725 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 19.7 in · 500 mm | 17.7 in · 450 mm | +11% 9500 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 13.0 ft · 3.95 m | 19.0 ft · 5.80 m | +47% MF 1102 |
| Fuel tank declared | 79.9 qt · 75.6 L | — | — |
Ford 9500 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9500”
Massey Ferguson MF 1102 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102”