Ford 9000 vs Massey Ferguson MF 1132

13 material differences

Tractor one

1969–1972

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1977–1982

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 9000 and the MF 1132 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 9000 and Massey Ferguson MF 1132, field by field
Field	9000	MF 1132	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	145.0 hp	131.3 hp	+10% 9000
Engine declared	Ford 401	Eicher EDK 6-5	differs
Displacement declared	6.58 L	5.89 L	+12% 9000
Maximum torque declared	372 lb·ft · 504 N·m	332 lb·ft · 450 N·m	+12% 9000
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	16.0 gpm · 60.6 L/min	11.9 gpm · 45.0 L/min	+35% 9000
Three-point lift at ends declared	7,055 lb · 3,200 kg	6,173 lb · 2,800 kg	+14% 9000
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,800 lb · 4,445 kg	12,919 lb · 5,860 kg	+32% MF 1132
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	16,535 lb · 7,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	91.5 in · 2,324 mm	107.5 in · 2,730 mm	+17% MF 1132
Length declared	151.0 in · 3,835 mm	181.5 in · 4,610 mm	+20% MF 1132
Width declared	91.1 in · 2,314 mm	91.7 in · 2,330 mm	—
Height declared	74.1 in · 1,882 mm	107.1 in · 2,720 mm	+45% MF 1132
Ground clearance declared	25.3 in · 643 mm	17.1 in · 435 mm	+48% 9000
Turning radius, braked declared	11.0 ft · 3.35 m	17.7 ft · 5.40 m	+61% MF 1132
Fuel tank declared	172.0 qt · 162.8 L	262.1 qt · 248.0 L	+52% MF 1132

Source

Source