Ford 8600 (A) vs Massey Ferguson MF 2680
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 8600 (A) and the MF 2680 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 8600 (A) | MF 2680 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 116.4 hp | 118.4 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Ford 401 DF | Perkins AT 6.354.4 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 6.58 L | 5.80 L | +13% 8600 (A) |
| Maximum torque declared | 296 lb·ft · 401 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | — | 14.1 gpm · 53.3 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 7,055 lb · 3,200 kg | 11,464 lb · 5,200 kg | +63% MF 2680 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 13,228 lb · 6,000 kg | 11,883 lb · 5,390 kg | +11% 8600 (A) |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 16,535 lb · 7,500 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 91.5 in · 2,324 mm | 107.3 in · 2,726 mm | +17% MF 2680 |
| Length declared | 148.3 in · 3,767 mm | 185.0 in · 4,700 mm | +25% MF 2680 |
| Width declared | 85.0 in · 2,159 mm | 90.6 in · 2,300 mm | +7% MF 2680 |
| Height declared | 73.0 in · 1,854 mm | 111.4 in · 2,830 mm | +53% MF 2680 |
| Ground clearance declared | 25.2 in · 640 mm | 18.9 in · 480 mm | +33% 8600 (A) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.0 ft · 3.35 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 172.2 qt · 163.0 L | 240.9 qt · 228.0 L | +40% MF 2680 |
Ford 8600 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8600”
Massey Ferguson MF 2680 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2680”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134”