6 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneFord 80001968–1972No measured PTO figureTractor twoJ.I. Case 10311966–1969No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 8000 and the 1031 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

6 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 8000 and J.I. Case 1031, field by field
Field80001031Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed108.5 hp102.1 hp+6% 8000
Engine declaredFord 401——
Displacement declared6.58 L——
Maximum torque declared283 lb·ft · 384 N·m——
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h15.5 mph · 25 km/h+20% 8000
Clutch declaredPedal-operated dry single-plate clutch——
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared12.0 gpm · 45.4 L/min12.0 gpm · 45.4 L/min—
Rear PTO speeds declared1000 rpm1000 rpm—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared9,978 lb · 4,526 kg9,334 lb · 4,234 kg+7% 8000
Wheelbase declared91.5 in · 2,324 mm108.9 in · 2,767 mm+19% 1031
Length declared148.3 in · 3,767 mm165.0 in · 4,191 mm+11% 1031
Width declared85.0 in · 2,159 mm88.0 in · 2,235 mm—
Height, over the bonnet declared74.0 in · 1,880 mm72.0 in · 1,829 mm—
Ground clearance declared25.3 in · 643 mm16.0 in · 406 mm+58% 8000
Turning radius, braked declared11.0 ft · 3.35 m11.2 ft · 3.43 m—
Fuel tank declared172.0 qt · 162.8 L192.0 qt · 181.7 L+12% 1031

Ford 8000 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8000”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”

J.I. Case 1031 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1031”