Ford 8000 vs J.I. Case 1031
6 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 8000 and the 1031 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
6 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 8000 | 1031 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 108.5 hp | 102.1 hp | +6% 8000 |
| Engine declared | Ford 401 | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 6.58 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 283 lb·ft · 384 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +20% 8000 |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 12.0 gpm · 45.4 L/min | 12.0 gpm · 45.4 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 7,055 lb · 3,200 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 9,978 lb · 4,526 kg | 9,334 lb · 4,234 kg | +7% 8000 |
| Wheelbase declared | 91.5 in · 2,324 mm | 108.9 in · 2,767 mm | +19% 1031 |
| Length declared | 148.3 in · 3,767 mm | 165.0 in · 4,191 mm | +11% 1031 |
| Width declared | 85.0 in · 2,159 mm | 88.0 in · 2,235 mm | — |
| Height declared | 74.0 in · 1,880 mm | 72.0 in · 1,829 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 25.3 in · 643 mm | 16.0 in · 406 mm | +58% 8000 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.0 ft · 3.35 m | 11.2 ft · 3.43 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 172.0 qt · 162.8 L | 192.0 qt · 181.7 L | +12% 1031 |
Ford 8000 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8000”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”
J.I. Case 1031 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1031”