Ford 7095 (A) or Lamborghini R-1056 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1056 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7095 (A) | R-1056 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 77 kW (103 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1056 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7095 (A) and the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7095 (A) and the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 48.0 L/min (12.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 7095 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,300 kg (7,275 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 3,930 kg (8,664 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 7095 (A) and the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | AheadThe Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 7095 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7095 (A) and the R-1056 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1056 DT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1981 | 1977–1984 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini R-1056 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 7095 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-1056 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources