Ford 4830 (A) or Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 4830 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 20% (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 4830 (A) and Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M), with the call on each
Question4830 (A)6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4830 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4830 (A) and the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4830 (A) and the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M).
Which pumps more oil for implements?35.3 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”42.3 L/min (11.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”AheadThe Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has 20% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Ford 4830 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,987 kg (4,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,960 kg (6,526 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”2,270 kg (5,004 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 4830 (A) is 30% heavier (690 kg / 1,521 lb) than the Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4830 (A) and the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4830 (A) and the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”AheadThe Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 4830 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini R 6560 L (DT)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19921988–2000EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has 20% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Ford 4830 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 4830 (A) is 30% heavier (690 kg / 1,521 lb) than the Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 4830 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4830 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6560 L (DT) TL 37 N/M (TL-37 DT/M) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources