8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneFord 36101981–1983No measured PTO figureTractor twoMassey Ferguson MF 2551975–1981No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 3610 and the MF 255 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

8 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 3610 and Massey Ferguson MF 255, field by field
Field3610MF 255Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed46.4 hp46.4 hp—
Engine declared—Perkins AD 3.152 S—
Displacement declared—2.50 L—
Maximum torque declared132 lb·ft · 179.5 N·m131 lb·ft · 178 N·m—
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h15.5 mph · 25 km/h+20% 3610
Clutch declared—pedal-operated dry and air-cooled Auburn double clutch—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared7.2 gpm · 27.4 L/min4.5 gpm · 17.0 L/min+61% 3610
Three-point lift, at the coupling points declared3,115 lb · 1,413 kg3,968 lb · 1,800 kg+27% MF 255
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540 rpm—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared5,335 lb · 2,420 kg5,159 lb · 2,340 kg—
Wheelbase declared75.8 in · 1,925 mm81.1 in · 2,060 mm+7% MF 255
Length declared128.0 in · 3,250 mm134.4 in · 3,415 mm—
Width declared64.6–88.6 in · 1,640–2,250 mm72.2 in · 1,835 mmdiffers
Height, over the safety frame declared84.6 in · 2,150 mm91.7 in · 2,330 mm+8% MF 255
Ground clearance declared12.4 in · 315 mm13.4 in · 340 mm+8% MF 255
Turning radius, braked declared10.1 ft · 3.07 m11.5 ft · 3.50 m+14% MF 255
Fuel tank declared52.0 qt · 49.2 L50.7 qt · 48 L—

Ford 3610 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3610”

Massey Ferguson MF 255 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 255”