7 material differences · fewer than 12
Tractor oneFord 2000 (USA)1962–1965No measured PTO figureTractor twoInternational Harvester 3641976–1977No measured PTO figure
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 2000 (USA) and the 364 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 2000 (USA) | 364 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 35.3 hp | 35.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-154 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 2.52 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 121 lb·ft · 164 N·m | 116 lb·ft · 157 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 17.4 mph · 28 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +12% 2000 (USA) |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry double clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | — | 7.2 gpm · 27.3 L/min | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,018 lb · 1,369 kg | 3,948 lb · 1,791 kg | +31% 364 |
| Wheelbase declared | 75.7 in · 1,924 mm | 76.5 in · 1,943 mm | — |
| Length declared | 120.8 in · 3,069 mm | 126.0 in · 3,200 mm | — |
| Width declared | 63.9–87.5 in · 1,623–2,223 mm | 65.0 in · 1,651 mm | differs |
| Height, over the steering wheel declared | 56.9 in · 1,446 mm | 59.0 in · 1,499 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 20.5 in · 521 mm | 18.5 in · 470 mm | +11% 2000 (USA) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.9 ft · 2.72 m | 8.2 ft · 2.49 m | +9% 2000 (USA) |
| Fuel tank declared | 52.0 qt · 49.2 L | 56.0 qt · 53.0 L | +8% 364 |
Ford 2000 (USA) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2000 (USA)”
International Harvester 364 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 364”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-414”