Ford 2000 (USA) vs Güldner G 40 (Toledo)

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1962–1965

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1962

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2000 (USA) and the G 40 (Toledo) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 2000 (USA) and Güldner G 40 (Toledo), field by field
Field	2000 (USA)	G 40 (Toledo)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	35.3 hp	35.34 hp	—
Engine declared	—	Güldner 3 L 79	—
Displacement declared	—	2.36 L	—
Maximum torque declared	121 lb·ft · 164 N·m	95 lb·ft · 128 N·m	+28% 2000 (USA)
Transmission
Top speed declared	17.4 mph · 28 km/h	12.4–18.6 mph · 20–30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry double clutch	Foot-operated dry double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min	—
Pressure declared	—	2,489 psi · 172 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	1,250 lb · 567 kg	3,748 lb · 1,700 kg	+200% G 40 (Toledo)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1150 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,018 lb · 1,369 kg	4,442 lb · 2,015 kg	+47% G 40 (Toledo)
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	4,526 lb · 2,053 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	75.7 in · 1,924 mm	76.9 in · 1,954 mm	—
Length declared	120.8 in · 3,069 mm	120.9 in · 3,070 mm	—
Width declared	63.9 in · 1,623 mm	61.9 in · 1,572 mm	—
Height declared	56.9 in · 1,446 mm	58.5 in · 1,485 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	20.5 in · 521 mm	15.7 in · 400 mm	+30% 2000 (USA)
Turning radius, braked declared	8.9 ft · 2.72 m	9.8 ft · 3.00 m	+10% G 40 (Toledo)
Fuel tank declared	52.0 qt · 49.2 L	50.7 qt · 48 L	—

Source

Source