Ford 1720 (A) vs Renault 351 M

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1987–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1977–1981

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1720 (A) and the 351 M → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 1720 (A) and Renault 351 M, field by field
Field	1720 (A)	351 M	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	26.1 hp	34.6 hp	+32% 351 M
Engine declared	ISHIKAWAJIMA-SHIBAURA N-843	MWM D 327-2	differs
Displacement declared	1.50 L	1.88 L	+26% 351 M
Maximum torque declared	63 lb·ft · 85.2 N·m	86 lb·ft · 117 N·m	+37% 351 M
Transmission
Top speed declared	13.7 mph · 22 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+14% 351 M
Clutch declared	pedal-operated dry Daikin double clutch	Dry VERTO double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	6.5 gpm · 24.6 L/min	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	2,441 lb · 1,107 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	2,491 lb · 1,130 kg	4,321 lb · 1,960 kg	+73% 351 M
Wheelbase declared	65.0 in · 1,650 mm	73.0 in · 1,854 mm	+12% 351 M
Length declared	121.2 in · 3,079 mm	125.4 in · 3,184 mm	—
Width declared	54.7 in · 1,390 mm	66.1 in · 1,680 mm	+21% 351 M
Height declared	84.6 in · 2,150 mm	92.5 in · 2,350 mm	+9% 351 M
Ground clearance declared	11.8 in · 300 mm	14.6 in · 370 mm	+23% 351 M
Turning radius, braked declared	—	10.4 ft · 3.16 m	—
Fuel tank declared	33.8 qt · 32.0 L	50.7 qt · 48.0 L	+50% 351 M

Source

Source