Fiat L 95 (DT) or International Harvester 3288?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat L 95 (DT): three-point lift.

  • The Fiat L 95 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (1,159 kg / 2,555 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat L 95 (DT) and International Harvester 3288, with the call on each
QuestionL 95 (DT)3288Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?65.0 kW (87.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”65.9 kW (88.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the L 95 (DT) and the 3288.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the L 95 (DT) and the 3288.
Which pumps more oil for implements?60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”56.8 L/min (15.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”3,041 kg (6,704 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”AheadThe Fiat L 95 (DT) has 38% more lift (1,159 kg / 2,555 lb) than the International Harvester 3288 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,400 kg (7,496 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”5,334 kg (11,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 3288 is 57% heavier (1,934 kg / 4,264 lb) than the Fiat L 95 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3288.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the L 95 (DT) and the 3288.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the L 95 (DT) and the 3288.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L95”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 3288”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1996–19981981–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat L 95 (DT) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat L 95 (DT) has 38% more lift (1,159 kg / 2,555 lb) than the International Harvester 3288 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 3288 is 57% heavier (1,934 kg / 4,264 lb) than the Fiat L 95 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat L 95 (DT) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources