Fiat L 75 (DT) or New Holland 6635 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the L 75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat L 75 (DT) and New Holland 6635 (A), with the call on each
QuestionL 75 (DT)6635 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the L 75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the L 75 (DT) and the 6635 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the L 75 (DT) and the 6635 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?——No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the L 75 (DT) and the 6635 (A).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,270 kg (9,414 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”4,270 kg (9,414 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the L 75 (DT) and the 6635 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the L 75 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri L85”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1996–19981996–1998EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the L 75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources