Fiat 940 (DT) or Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 940 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Robust 901 A (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fiat 940 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 940 (DT) and Hanomag Robust 901 A (S), with the call on each
Question940 (DT)Robust 901 A (S)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?67.7 kW (90.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 940/940 DT”68 kW (91 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 940 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Robust 901 A (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 940 (DT) and the Robust 901 A (S).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 940 (DT) and the Robust 901 A (S).
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 940/940 DT”32 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”AheadThe Fiat 940 (DT) has 19% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Hanomag Robust 901 A (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 940/940 DT”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Robust 901 A (S).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,950 kg (8,708 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 940/940 DT”3,730 kg (8,223 lb) to 4,030 kg (8,885 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 940 (DT) and the Robust 901 A (S).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 940/940 DT”12Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 940 (DT) and the Robust 901 A (S).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 940/940 DT”19.87 km/h (12.3 mph) to 27.15 km/h (16.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 940 (DT).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 940 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 940/940 DT”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag Robust 901 A (S)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19791969–1970Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 940 (DT) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 940 (DT) has 19% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Hanomag Robust 901 A (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 940 (DT) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 940 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Robust 901 A (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources