Fiat 70-56 LM (DT or International Harvester Hydro 70?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 70-56 LM (DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester Hydro 70 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The International Harvester Hydro 70 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 70-56 LM (DT | Hydro 70 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-56 LM (DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 70-56 LM (DT and the Hydro 70. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 70-56 LM (DT and the Hydro 70. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 32.8 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | 45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70” | AheadThe International Harvester Hydro 70 has 39% more hydraulic flow (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,540 kg (5,600 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Hydro 70. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,430 kg (5,357 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | 3,828 kg (8,439 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester Hydro 70 is 58% heavier (1,398 kg / 3,082 lb) than the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 70-56 LM (DT and the Hydro 70. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT has 8 to 12 forward gears and the International Harvester Hydro 70 is stepless (CVT) — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 70-56 LM (DT and the Hydro 70. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | 34 km/h (21.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70” | AheadThe International Harvester Hydro 70 has 13% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Hydro 70. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 70-56 LM (DT)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC Hydro 70” | AheadThe Fiat 70-56 LM (DT is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Hydro 70 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1988– | 1973–1976 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 70-56 LM (DT is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester Hydro 70 has 39% more hydraulic flow (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester Hydro 70 is 58% heavier (1,398 kg / 3,082 lb) than the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester Hydro 70 has 13% more top speed (4.0 km/h / 2.5 mph) than the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat 70-56 LM (DT is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Hydro 70 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Fiat 70-56 LM (DT is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Fiat 70-56 LM (DT has 8 to 12 forward gears and the International Harvester Hydro 70 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 70-56 LM (DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Hydro 70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources