Fiat 650-S (DT) or J.I. Case 1294 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the J.I. Case 1294 (DT) is ahead on top speed; the Fiat 650-S (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Fiat 650-S (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The J.I. Case 1294 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 650-S (DT) and J.I. Case 1294 (DT), with the call on each
Question650-S (DT)1294 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.2 kW (55.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”41.2 kW (55.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 650-S (DT) and the 1294 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 650-S (DT) and the 1294 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.8 L/min (7.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”27.3 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,250 kg (4,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”1,345 kg (2,965 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 650-S (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”); the 1294 (DT): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,875 kg (6,338 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”2,865 kg (6,316 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 650-S (DT) and the 1294 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?7 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 650-S (DT) and the 1294 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”AheadThe J.I. Case 1294 (DT) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the Fiat 650-S (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”AheadThe Fiat 650-S (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 1294 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 650-S (DT) and the 1294 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19741984–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1294 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 1294 (DT) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the Fiat 650-S (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 650-S (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 1294 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The J.I. Case 1294 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 650-S (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 650 S/650 S/DT”); the 1294 (DT): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1294”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources