Fiat 55-90 (DT) vs URSUS C-362
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (Two-wheel or four-wheel drive; 2WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
9 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 55-90 (DT) | C-362 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 54.3 hp | 51.2 hp | +6% 55-90 (DT) |
| Engine declared | FIAT-IVECO 8035.06.200 or (300) | URSUS/ZM S-4003 A | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.71 L | 3.12 L | +15% C-362 |
| Maximum torque declared | 129 lb·ft · 175 N·m | 133 lb·ft · 180 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | 16.8 mph · 27 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | Dry Valeo, O.M.G. or LuK double clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | — | 6.9 gpm · 26.3 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 5,324 lb · 2,415 kg | 2,646 lb · 1,200 kg | +101% 55-90 (DT) |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,129 lb · 2,780 kg | 5,785 lb · 2,624 kg | +6% 55-90 (DT) |
| Wheelbase declared | 87.7 in · 2,227 mm | 85.0 in · 2,160 mm | — |
| Length declared | 147.0 in · 3,733 mm | 142.9 in · 3,630 mm | — |
| Width declared | 67.3 in · 1,710 mm | 65.7 in · 1,670 mm | — |
| Height declared | 98.8 in · 2,510 mm | 105.9 in · 2,690 mm | +7% C-362 |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.5 in · 445 mm | 15.6 in · 395 mm | +13% 55-90 (DT) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.4 ft · 3.46 m | 11.1 ft · 3.37 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 98.3 qt · 93.0 L | 79.3 qt · 75.0 L | +24% 55-90 (DT) |
Fiat 55-90 (DT) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 55-90/55-90 DT”
URSUS C-362 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-362”