Fiat 55-66 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 362/II?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Fiat 55-66 (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Fiat 55-66 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 55-66 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 362/II, with the call on each
Question55-66 (DT)MF 362/IICall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.4 kW (44.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”33.2 kW (44.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 55-66 (DT) and the MF 362/II.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 55-66 (DT) and the MF 362/II.
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 55-66 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,260 kg (4,982 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”2,891 kg (6,373 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 55-66 (DT): lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”); the MF 362/II: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,255 kg (4,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”2,750 kg (6,063 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II is 22% heavier (495 kg / 1,091 lb) than the Fiat 55-66 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 362/II.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”12 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 55-66 (DT) and the MF 362/II.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”AheadThe Fiat 55-66 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 362/II does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19921992–1997Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II is 22% heavier (495 kg / 1,091 lb) than the Fiat 55-66 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 55-66 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 362/II does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 362/II is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 55-66 (DT): lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 55-66/55-66 DT”); the MF 362/II: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 362/II”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources