Fiat 500 (DT) or J.I. Case 530?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 530: hydraulic flow. On features, the Fiat 500 (DT) is ahead on drive.
- The J.I. Case 530 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 61% (13.4 L/min / 3.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Fiat 500 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 500 (DT) | 530 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.2 kW (40.46 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | 30.4 kW (40.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 500 (DT) and the 530. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 500 (DT) and the 530. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | 35.2 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | AheadThe J.I. Case 530 has 61% more hydraulic flow (13.4 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Fiat 500 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,620 kg (3,571 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 530. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,825 kg (4,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | 1,814 kg (3,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 500 (DT) and the 530. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | 4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 500 (DT) and the 530. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 500 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 500/500 DT” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 530” | AheadThe Fiat 500 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 530 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1971–1973 | 1960–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 500 (DT) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The J.I. Case 530 has 61% more hydraulic flow (13.4 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Fiat 500 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat 500 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 530 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Fiat 500 (DT) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources