Fiat 50-R or John Deere-LANZ 700?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 50-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 50-R | 700 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | 36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 50-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 50-R and the 700. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 50-R and the 700. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 700. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 950 kg (2,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | 1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 50-R: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R”); the 700: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | 2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 50-R. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 700 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Fiat 50-R (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 50-R and the 700. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | AheadThe John Deere-LANZ 700 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 50-R does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 700. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1958–1959 | 1963–1965 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere-LANZ 700 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere-LANZ 700 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Fiat 50-R (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere-LANZ 700 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 50-R does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere-LANZ 700 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 50-R has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 50-R: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 50 R”); the 700: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources