Fiat 480-8 (DT) vs International Harvester 484
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 480-8 (DT) and the 484 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 480-8 (DT) | 484 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 47.3 hp | 49.3 hp | — |
| Engine declared | FIAT-IVECO 8035.02.200 (300) | INTERNATIONAL-HARVESTER D-179 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.59 L | 2.93 L | +13% 484 |
| Maximum torque declared | 112 lb·ft · 152 N·m | 120 lb·ft · 163 N·m | +7% 484 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal-operated dry Laycock single-disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.1 gpm · 26.8 L/min | 8.8 gpm · 33.3 L/min | +24% 484 |
| Pressure declared | 2,843 psi · 196 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,858 lb · 1,750 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,990 lb · 1,810 kg | 5,137 lb · 2,330 kg | +29% 484 |
| Wheelbase declared | 76.9 in · 1,953 mm | 79.0 in · 2,007 mm | — |
| Length declared | 114.6 in · 2,910 mm | 134.3 in · 3,411 mm | +17% 484 |
| Width declared | 70.5 in · 1,790 mm | 105.5 in · 2,680 mm | +50% 484 |
| Height declared | 87.6 in · 2,225 mm | 96.4 in · 2,449 mm | +10% 484 |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.9 in · 455 mm | 10.8 in · 275 mm | +65% 480-8 (DT) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.7 ft · 2.95 m | 11.1 ft · 3.37 m | +14% 484 |
| Fuel tank declared | 57.1 qt · 54.0 L | 81.4 qt · 77.0 L | +43% 484 |
Fiat 480-8 (DT) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 480-8/480-8 DT”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 480/480 DT”
International Harvester 484 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 484”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 523”