Fiat 440 (DT) or John Deere 2000 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 440 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2000 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 16% (280 kg / 617 lb) more three-point lift.
- The John Deere 2000 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 440 (DT) | 2000 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 440 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 440 (DT) and the 2000 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 440 (DT) and the 2000 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | AheadThe John Deere 2000 (A) has 19% more hydraulic flow (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,750 kg (3,858 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 2,030 kg (4,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | AheadThe John Deere 2000 (A) has 16% more lift (280 kg / 617 lb) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 2,895 kg (6,382 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2000 (A) is 52% heavier (995 kg / 2,194 lb) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 440 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 440 (DT) and the 2000 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | AheadThe John Deere 2000 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | AheadThe John Deere 2000 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 440 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 440 (DT) and the 2000 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 440/440 DT” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982 | 1993–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2000 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2000 (A) has 19% more hydraulic flow (5.2 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) has 16% more lift (280 kg / 617 lb) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) is 52% heavier (995 kg / 2,194 lb) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fiat 440 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 440 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 440 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources