Fiat 44-28 vs J.I. Case 4890

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1979–1982

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1979–1983

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 44-28 and the 4890 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fiat 44-28 and J.I. Case 4890, field by field
Field	44-28	4890	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	276.4 hp	296.0 hp	+7% 4890
Engine declared	CUMMINS NT-855 C 280	SAAB-SCANIA 11-L	differs
Displacement declared	14.02 L	8.26 L	+70% 44-28
Maximum torque declared	863 lb·ft · 1,170 N·m	487 lb·ft · 660 N·m	+77% 44-28
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+20% 4890
Clutch declared	Dry Dana-Spicer double clutch	Hydraulically operated wet disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	23.6 gpm · 89.4 L/min	24.0 gpm · 90.8 L/min	—
Pressure declared	3,336–3,481 psi · 230–240 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	18,298 lb · 8,300 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	22,972 lb · 10,420 kg	25,750 lb · 11,680 kg	+12% 4890
Wheelbase declared	131.5 in · 3,340 mm	110.0 in · 2,794 mm	+20% 44-28
Length declared	255.9 in · 6,500 mm	243.0 in · 6,172 mm	+5% 44-28
Width declared	99.6 in · 2,530 mm	99.0 in · 2,515 mm	—
Height declared	139.8 in · 3,550 mm	—	—
Ground clearance declared	16.5 in · 420 mm	18.0 in · 457 mm	+9% 4890
Fuel tank declared	739.7 qt · 700.0 L	—	—

Source

Source