Fiat 400 (DT) or UTB U-360?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 400 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-360 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fiat 400 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 400 (DT) and UTB U-360, with the call on each
Question400 (DT)U-360Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?25.7 kW (34.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”25.7 kW (34.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 400 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-360 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 400 (DT) and the U-360.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 400 (DT) and the U-360.
Which pumps more oil for implements?21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,701 kg (3,750 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”1,723 kg (3,799 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 400 (DT) and the U-360.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 400 (DT) and the U-360.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the U-360.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 400/400 DT”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 360”AheadThe Fiat 400 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the UTB U-360 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1968–19741977–1991Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-360 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 400 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the UTB U-360 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The UTB U-360 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 400 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-360 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources