Fiat 300 (DT) vs Renault 351 M
13 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 300 (DT) and the 351 M → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
13 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 300 (DT) | 351 M | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 30.6 hp | 34.6 hp | +13% 351 M |
| Engine declared | FIAT-IVECO 8025.01.200 or 300 | MWM D 327-2 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.73 L | 1.88 L | +9% 351 M |
| Maximum torque declared | 71 lb·ft · 96 N·m | 86 lb·ft · 117 N·m | +22% 351 M |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry FIAT single-plate clutch | Dry VERTO double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 2.5 gpm · 9.3 L/min | 6.5 gpm · 24.6 L/min | +165% 351 M |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 1,433 lb · 650 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 2,690 lb · 1,220 kg | 4,321 lb · 1,960 kg | +61% 351 M |
| Wheelbase declared | 66.9 in · 1,700 mm | 73.0 in · 1,854 mm | +9% 351 M |
| Length declared | 107.9 in · 2,740 mm | 125.4 in · 3,184 mm | +16% 351 M |
| Width declared | 60.6 in · 1,540 mm | 66.1 in · 1,680 mm | +9% 351 M |
| Height declared | 61.8 in · 1,570 mm | 92.5 in · 2,350 mm | +50% 351 M |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.5 in · 470 mm | 14.6 in · 370 mm | +27% 300 (DT) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.5 ft · 2.89 m | 10.4 ft · 3.16 m | +9% 351 M |
| Fuel tank declared | 30.6 qt · 29.0 L | 50.7 qt · 48.0 L | +66% 351 M |
Fiat 300 (DT) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 300/300 DT”
Renault 351 M sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50S R7365”